A Profile of Adult Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pneumonia Patients According to Pneumococcal Vaccination Status.

Certain patient profile characteristics, such as preexisting medical conditions, can modify the risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia among adults vaccinated and not vaccinated against pneumococcal disease. This retrospective cohort study aimed to quantify the risk of pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 among individuals from 15 to 64 years old with and without pneumococcal vaccination in Spain during the 2020-2021 influenza season and establish a risk profile of patients more likely to develop SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Data (demographic information, patient medical history, and lifestyle habits) were gathered both directly from the patient via personal interview and by reviewing electronic medical records. In an adjusted analysis for pneumococcal vaccinated patients, visits to hospital outpatient clinics were protective while visits to primary health care services, being widowed, obese, and not using masks in outdoor open spaces were identified as risk factors. For patients who had not received a pneumococcal vaccine, visits to hospital outpatient clinics were protective, while being overweight or obese, alcohol consumption, and not using masks in outdoor open spaces were identified as risk factors. Concerning comorbidities, in the pneumococcal vaccinated group none were found to be protective but having diabetes or other respiratory diseases were identified as risk factors. In the unvaccinated group, undergoing immunosuppressive treatment and having metastatic tumors were protective factors, while cerebrovascular disease and obesity with a BMI ≥ 40 were risk factors. A similar risk profile for developing SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in pneumococcal vaccinated and non-vaccinated individuals was found. Generally, vaccinated individuals had a lower risk of developing SARS-CoV-2. The findings suggest that vaccination against S. pneumoniae could prevent and reduce SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Additionally, this study has identified individuals with other medical conditions, such as obesity, underweight, diabetes, and a history of respiratory diseases, who are at an increased risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and could benefit from vaccination and supervision.

Ischemic heart disease in patients from Northwest Spain with biopsy proven giant cell arteritis. A population based study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence, mortality, and predictors of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in patients from the Lugo region of Northwest Spain with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven GCA diagnosed from 1981 to 2001 at the single hospital for a population of 250,000 people. A survival analysis was performed. Hazard ratios and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) as well as predictors of IHD in patients with biopsy-proven GCA were also assessed. RESULTS: Nineteen (9%) of the 210 patients with biopsy-proven GCA diagnosed during the period of study had IHD. The incidence of IHD in patients with GCA was 12.6/1000 person-years at risk (95% CI 6.9-21.0). During the study period 1981-2000 the population aged > or = 50 years in Lugo was roughly 100,000, and the mortality rate due to IHD in patients with GCA for that population was 8/100,000. The SMR in patients with GCA due to IHD was 1.62 (95% CI 0.70-3.20). Mortality in patients with GCA who had IHD was higher than in those patients without IHD (age and sex adjusted hazard ratio 2.81, 95% CI 1.51-5.21; p = 0.001). Age (hazard ratio 1.15), hypertension (hazard ratio 2.51), and abnormal temporal artery on physical examination (hazard ratio 0.36) at the time of diagnosis of GCA were the best predictors of IHD over the followup period in patients with biopsy-proven GCA. CONCLUSION: Our observations suggest that mortality due to IHD in patients from Lugo with GCA is not much higher than that reported in the Spanish population aged 50 years and older. However, mortality in patients with GCA with IHD is higher than in GCA patients without IHD.

[Readability of informed consent documents used in the hospitals of Asturias]. / La legibilidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado en los hospitales de Asturias.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the readability of the informed consent documents (ICD) used in the health centers of Asturias (Spain) with the aim of verifying whether the ICD are understandable and sufficient as a vehicle of information to empower patients to participate in decisions related to their diagnosis and treatment. METHOD: A total of 1114 ICD were gathered from the health centers in Asturias. A representative random sample from each hospital was selected and the following readability indexes were obtained: the Flesch index, the sentence complexity index, and the integrated legibility index. RESULTS: Of the ICD in the sample studied, legibility was acceptable in 77.3% (221 out of 286) according to the integrated legibility index, in 75.2% (215 out of 286) according to the sentence complexity index and in 3.5% (10 out of 286) according to the Flesch index. The mean values of the indexes differed among hospitals (p < 0.001, ANOVA test). CONCLUSIONS: ICD written in Spanish achieved low readability scores in the Flesch index and require corrective measures. Three quarters of the ICD were acceptable due to the use of simple sentences in the text. We believe that readability indexes should be used when drafting or improving informed consent documents.